INDONESIA — THE COAL GIANT ON THE ROAD TO DIGITAL SOVEREIGNTY

INTRODUCTION: A BRIEF DIAGNOSIS

Indonesia is one of the most dynamic points on the map of the emerging energy-digital system. It is a country that simultaneously represents:

• A coal giant deliberately restricting production. Indonesia remains the world’s largest exporter of thermal coal. In 2025, production reached 817.48 million tonnes, but the government set a target cap of 600 million tonnes for 2026 — a 24% year-on-year reduction [6]. During the first seven months of 2026, production reached 423.71 million tonnes, of which 270 million tonnes were exported [1][11]. This is not a crisis but a deliberate policy of “optimal production,” through which the state seeks to balance the market rather than maximize output [1].
• A nickel powerhouse facing an internal paradox. Indonesia controls approximately two-thirds of global nickel production and holds 42–45% of the world’s nickel reserves [7][12]. However, production restrictions — with a 2026 quota of 250–270 million tonnes of nickel ore — have created a paradox: a country with the world’s largest nickel reserves is forced to import ore because processing capacity of 340–350 million tonnes exceeds permitted extraction volumes [2].
• A country with some of the world’s cheapest energy for Bitcoin mining. According to 2026 estimates, the energy cost of mining one BTC in Indonesia is approximately €53,034 — reportedly the lowest figure in the world, below Kazakhstan and Norway [5]. Energy costs are cited at around $0.02/kWh, with hydropower identified as a contributing factor [10]. With modern equipment, the estimated cost of mining one BTC is approximately $16,000.
• A country that has completed its regulatory transition. In January 2026, OJK and Bappebti officially completed the transfer of crypto-asset supervision from the commodities-trading authority to the financial regulator [4]. Crypto-assets are now classified as financial instruments rather than commodities [3][9]. This is a fundamental change that opens the way for institutional adoption.

Indonesia’s paradox: the country reportedly has the world’s cheapest energy for mining and has completed a major regulatory reform, yet it does not systematically exploit this combination. It restricts coal and nickel production but has no comprehensive strategy for monetizing surplus energy through Bitcoin. It is building digital financial infrastructure without building a corresponding digital energy strategy.

SECTION 1. THE OLD MODEL: WHAT EXISTED AND WHAT BROKE DOWN

For decades, Indonesia’s economic model rested on three pillars.

Commodity exports. Coal, nickel, palm oil, and gas made Indonesia a resource warehouse for Asia, particularly for China and India [1][11].

Downstreaming. Indonesia pursued a transition from raw-material exports to domestic processing. Restrictions on unprocessed ore exports, introduced in 2014 and fully implemented from 2020, pushed foreign companies to build processing plants inside Indonesia [12].

State control over resources. Through the RKAB system — the Work Plan and Budget — the government regulates the extraction volumes of individual companies [2].

This model is showing signs of strain, but not because it has failed. Rather, it is creating contradictions precisely because it has been so effective.

The coal paradox

Indonesia is cutting coal production by 24%, yet government revenue from the coal sector is increasing. During the first eight months of 2026, non-tax state revenue (PNBP) from coal reached 66 trillion rupiah, compared with 59 trillion rupiah a year earlier — an increase of 7 trillion rupiah [16].

This suggests that the government has learned to generate more revenue from lower volumes by exercising greater control over prices and the market.

The nickel paradox

Indonesia is restricting nickel production to support prices, but processing capacity is expanding faster than permitted extraction. The result: a country with the world’s largest nickel reserves is importing ore [2].

Indonesian lawmaker Ateng Sutisna described this as a “natural resource sovereignty paradox”:

“We limit production to improve global prices, but at the same time we spend foreign currency buying raw materials from other countries” [2].

The old map no longer reflects the new territory. Indonesia was once seen primarily as a commodity exporter, a low-cost labor market, and a resource warehouse. The new reality is one of deliberate production restrictions, industrial policy, and a regulatory shift toward digital finance.

SECTION 2. THE ENERGY PROFILE: WHAT INDONESIA HAS AND WHAT IT LACKS

Indonesia is an energy giant with a distinctive combination of inexpensive energy and state control over natural resources.

What Indonesia has	What Indonesia lacks
Enormous coal resources and production of 817 million tonnes in 2025 [1]	A systematic strategy for monetizing energy through mining
The world’s largest nickel reserves, accounting for 42–45% of the global total [7]	Coordination between extraction and processing, resulting in ore imports despite abundant reserves [2]
Some of the world’s cheapest energy for mining, at approximately $0.02/kWh [10]	Sufficient infrastructure for industrial-scale mining
Significant hydropower potential	Political commitment to integrating mining into the national energy balance
A completed regulatory transition to OJK supervision [4]	A unified digital energy strategy

The key fact: according to 2026 estimates, the energy cost of mining one BTC in Indonesia is approximately €53,034 — reportedly the lowest in the world, below Kazakhstan and Norway [5]. With modern equipment such as the Antminer S21, the estimated cost of mining one BTC is approximately $16,000 [10].

This would make Indonesia one of the world’s most attractive jurisdictions for industrial Bitcoin mining if the cost estimates translate into commercially available electricity and the necessary infrastructure.

A new element: the digital regulatory shift

In January 2026, OJK and Bappebti completed the transfer of crypto-asset supervision [4]. Crypto-assets are now classified as financial instruments rather than commodities [3][9].

This opens a path toward institutional adoption: banks, funds, and other regulated entities can engage with crypto-assets within the financial regulatory framework.

Conclusion: Indonesia combines exceptionally low reported mining energy costs with a completed regulatory reform, but it lacks a systematic strategy for monetizing energy through digital assets.

SECTION 3. INDONESIA’S POSITION ON MINING AND CRYPTOCURRENCIES

This is where Indonesia’s central paradox becomes apparent.

The current situation

Mining is not prohibited, but it has no dedicated regulatory framework. The economics look attractive on paper, while the necessary infrastructure remains underdeveloped.

The legal framework

• Mining itself is not prohibited, but it has no special legal status [3][9].
• From 2026, mining income is subject to the general income tax rules under PPh Article 17 rather than a fixed tax rate [3][18].
• Verification services — including mining itself, according to the cited source — are subject to VAT at a specified rate of 2.2% [3].

Mining economics

• Electricity: approximately $0.02/kWh, reportedly among the cheapest rates in the world [10].
• Estimated cost of mining one BTC: approximately $16,000 [10].
• Comparison: Russia — $35,000–45,000; United States — $55,000–75,000.

The key fact: Indonesia reportedly has some of the world’s cheapest energy for Bitcoin mining, yet its share of the global hashrate remains minimal. This indicates that the economic potential has not been fully realized.

The regulatory environment

The government has introduced mandatory reporting requirements for crypto exchanges. They must disclose user and transaction information to the Directorate General of Taxes (DJP) [8][13].

Transactions exceeding $50,000 are subject to mandatory reporting under the rules cited in the source material [8].

This increases transparency but does not, by itself, create incentives for mining.

The paradox: Indonesia has inexpensive energy for Bitcoin mining but does not exploit it systematically. It regulates trading, but not mining as a strategic industry.

SECTION 4. THE REGULATORS: OJK, BANK INDONESIA, AND DJP

Indonesia is among the countries that have completed a major regulatory transition in the digital-asset sector.

4.1. OJK — Financial Services Authority

Completion of the transition. In January 2026, OJK and Bappebti officially completed the transfer of supervisory responsibilities [4].

Classification. Crypto-assets are defined as “digital financial assets” and treated within a financial regulatory framework [3].

Licensing. Regulation POJK 27/2024, as amended by POJK 23/2025, establishes operational rules for trading digital financial assets [9].

4.2. Bank Indonesia — the central bank

Payment restrictions. Crypto-assets are not legal tender. The Indonesian rupiah remains the country’s sole legal means of payment [9].

Position. Bank Indonesia does not support the use of cryptocurrencies for payments but does not prohibit investment in them.

4.3. DJP — Directorate General of Taxes

PMK 108/2025. Crypto exchanges are subject to mandatory reporting under the Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) [8][13].

Reporting schedule. Annual reporting begins in 2026, with the first report due by April 30, 2027 [13].

Transactions above $50,000. Mandatory reporting applies to the transactions described in the cited rules [8].

The key principle

Indonesia is building a regulatory framework, but not the corresponding infrastructure.

It is establishing a legal foundation for digital assets without ensuring that miners have access to the electricity and infrastructure they need. It is aligning with international reporting standards such as CARF but has yet to systematically exploit its competitive advantages.

SECTION 5. GEOPOLITICAL POSITION: BETWEEN CHINA AND THE UNITED STATES

Indonesia balances between China, its largest resource buyer and a major investor, and the United States, a longstanding regional partner.

China. Chinese companies dominate Indonesia’s nickel-processing industry. According to the cited estimates, Chinese firms have invested approximately $30 billion in nickel processing and control roughly three-quarters of its capacity [12].

Indonesia retains territorial control over its resources, but much of the organizational and industrial capacity remains embedded in Chinese business networks [12].

The United States. The US remains a longstanding partner, although Indonesia’s trade ties with China are more significant. Indonesia follows Western-oriented regulatory standards such as CARF while maintaining an independent energy policy.

The architectural conclusion

Indonesia is a supplier of critical resources — coal and nickel — for the emerging system, but it is not yet one of its architects.

The country balances between China and the United States without a comprehensive domestic strategy for monetizing energy through digital assets.

SECTION 6. THE ARCHITECTURAL CONCLUSION: WHAT PATH IS AVAILABLE TO INDONESIA?

Indonesia combines a set of characteristics rarely found together:

• Some of the world’s cheapest reported energy for mining: approximately $0.02/kWh, with an estimated cost of $16,000 per BTC [5][10].
• Control over the world’s largest nickel reserves, representing 42–45% of the global total [7].
• A completed regulatory transition to OJK supervision, with crypto-assets treated as financial instruments [4].
• Deliberate restrictions on coal and nickel production to manage markets [1][2].
• The paradox of importing nickel ore despite abundant domestic reserves [2].
• No systematic Bitcoin mining strategy.

Indonesia’s structural weaknesses

1. The absence of a mining strategy. The country’s reported energy-cost advantage is not being exploited systematically [5][10].

2. The nickel paradox. Production restrictions combined with expanding processing capacity have led to ore imports [2].

3. Dependence on China. Chinese companies control approximately three-quarters of Indonesia’s nickel-processing capacity [12].

4. An infrastructure deficit. Indonesia lacks a sufficiently developed infrastructure for industrial-scale Bitcoin mining.

5. Regulatory uncertainty for miners. Mining has no dedicated legal status, and its taxation has not been specifically adapted to the industry [3][18].

The main conclusion

Indonesia will not simply “import Bitcoin” like Europe. It has its own energy resources, and its reported energy costs are among the lowest in the world.

Yet Indonesia will not automatically “mine Bitcoin” on an industrial scale like Russia or Iran either. It has energy, but it lacks the infrastructure and strategy needed to turn that advantage into a major industry.

It will continue exporting coal and nickel — but it will not necessarily monetize those resources through digital assets.

For Indonesia, Bitcoin is not yet an “energy coupon” or a “strategic reserve.” It is a missed opportunity: a resource the country could use but has not deployed systematically because of infrastructure gaps and the absence of a coherent strategy.

CONCLUSION: INDONESIA’S PLACE IN THE GLOBAL TRANSITION

Indonesia is neither an architect of the emerging system nor its victim. It is a coal giant on the road to digital sovereignty that has yet to take the final step.

Europe risks becoming a long-term Bitcoin importer because it lacks sufficient low-cost energy.

China is building parallel infrastructure because it has a strategy.

The United States is seeking to preserve its dominance through Bitcoin-reserve initiatives as the traditional dollar-centered system faces growing pressure.

Russia could become an energy-sovereign player if it develops a coherent strategy.

Indonesia has some of the world’s cheapest reported energy for mining and has completed a major regulatory reform. Yet it is not exploiting this potential systematically. It restricts coal and nickel production but has no comprehensive strategy for monetizing surplus energy. It imports nickel ore despite its abundant reserves. It is building digital financial infrastructure without developing a corresponding digital energy strategy.

The global significance: Indonesia demonstrates that even a country with exceptionally cheap energy and progressive regulation can remain on the sidelines of the emerging system if it fails to establish a strategy for monetizing energy through digital assets.

The question is not simply whether Indonesia will use Bitcoin. The question is whether it can overcome its infrastructure deficit and develop a coherent strategy — or whether it will remain a resource supplier to those building the future.

FULL LIST OF SOURCES

[1] ANTARA News — Produksi batu bara capai 423,71 juta ton hingga Juli 2026 (September 2026) — https://www.antaranews.com

[2] EMedia DPR RI — Ateng Sutisna Soroti Paradoks RKAB Nikel (August 2026) — https://emedia.dpr.go.id

[3] Kementerian Keuangan RI — PMK 50/2025: Pajak Aset Kripto (July 2025) — https://www.pajak.go.id

[4] OJK — OJK dan Bappebti Akhiri Masa Transisi Pengaturan Aset Kripto (January 2026) — https://www.ojk.go.id

[5] Nordiska Projekt — Ny rapport avslöjar de länder där Bitcoin-brytning är mest lönsam (January 2026) — https://www.nordiskaprojekt.se

[6] Wood Mackenzie — Indonesia coal supply summary (September 2026) — https://www.woodmac.com

[7] 环球时报 — 从3.79亿到2.5亿，印尼政策调整牵动全球产业链神经 (July 2026) — https://www.163.com

[8] IDX Channel — Purbaya Wajibkan Exchanger Kripto Lapor Data ke DJP (January 2026) — https://www.idxchannel.com

[9] DFDL — Crypto Assets in Indonesia: Legal Status & Regulation (September 2026) — https://www.dfdl.com

[10] BitHub.pl — Kopanie kryptowalut? Wiemy gdzie jest najtańsza energia (July 2026) — https://bithub.pl

[11] PERHAPI — Capai 423,71 Juta Ton hingga Juli 2026 (September 2026) — https://perhapi.or.id

[12] FT Mercati — Indonesia’s Nickel Nationalization Drive (August 2026) — https://www.ftmercati.com

[13] Lexology — Indonesia – Crypto-Asset Reporting Framework Implemented (May 2026) — https://www.lexology.com

[14] Lexology — First-step analysis: fintech regulation in Indonesia (July 2026) — https://www.lexology.com

[15] Pluang — Apa Itu Mining Crypto? (September 2026) — https://pluang.com

[16] PERHAPI — Produksi Batu Bara Turun 8 Juta Ton per Bulan, PNBP Naik Rp7 Triliun (September 2026) — https://perhapi.or.id

[17] ANTARA News — Govt shifts critical minerals focus to Indonesia’s energy security (August 2026) — https://en.antaranews.com

[18] 国家税务总局 — 印度尼西亚修订加密资产交易的税收规定 (August 2025) — https://www.chinatax.gov.cn

[19] Rajah & Tann Asia — Regional Round-Up: Indonesia Q2 2026 (July 2026) — https://www.rajahtannasia.com

[20] Threads — Biaya Mining Bitcoin di Indonesia (October 2025) — https://www.threads.com

© 2026, editorial offices of Kafedra and SforNews. A link to the original source is mandatory when quoting.