“The Fifth Gas Station”: Who Really Caused the Fuel Collapse in Russia | Sfornews

  • 9 Jul, 2026
    | Salome K

“THE FIFTH GAS STATION”: WHO REALLY CAUSED THE FUEL COLLAPSE IN RUSSIA

How sabotage, speculation, and tax benefits repeat the scenario of the USSR’s collapse

DISCLAIMER

This material represents an analytical commentary on the statements of economist Mikhail Khazin regarding the fuel crisis in Russia. The material is based on open data and public statements. We do not provide legal assessments but analyze the systemic logic of the situation. All conclusions are probabilistic in nature.

FROM THE EDITORS: WHY WE ANALYZE THE RUSSIAN SITUATION

We analyze the situation in Russia not because it is unique. But because we understand it well — we understand the legal fabric, the historical context, the ownership structure, and the decision-making mechanisms.

The symptoms we observe can manifest in any country in the world. Wherever there are resources, there are attempts to expropriate them. Wherever there are old plants built by the state, there is management that wants to control but does not want to invest. Wherever there is ownership uncertainty, there is degradation and crisis.

This article is a direct continuation of our material “The Agony of the Map: Why the Stock Market No Longer Saves” [1], where we described how the map (financial instruments, legal fictions) becomes detached from the territory (real assets, resources, production). The fuel crisis is the agony of the map in oil refining: plants built by the people became private “assets” on paper, while the real economy is collapsing [1].

INTRODUCTION: KHAZIN SAID WHAT WE WERE THINKING

Mikhail Khazin, an economist known for his systemic criticism, stated:

“The problems with gasoline in the European part of Russia or in Siberia — they are largely caused by sabotage. This is very similar to the gasoline and tobacco problems of the late 1980s — exactly one-to-one. This frenzy is artificially caused by speculation.”

He compares the current fuel crisis with the shortages in the USSR before its collapse. And he names the culprits: “their own people” .

This is not conspiracy theory. This is systemic analysis.

PART 1. THE AGONY OF THE MAP: HOW “STATE” BECAME “PRIVATE”

In our article “The Agony of the Map” [1], we showed how the financial system became detached from the real economy. Stocks and bonds ceased to reflect the territory — they became a map that exists on its own.

The same logic applies to oil refining:

The Map: joint-stock companies, legal entities, dividends, tax reporting.
The Territory: Soviet-era plants built by the people, physical installations, pipes, tanks, real fuel.

When the map detaches from the territory, management stops investing in real assets. It begins to manage the map — withdrawing profits, requesting benefits, creating shortages.

Legal paradox: According to the Constitution, subsoil is the common heritage of the people. But the plants that process this heritage are privately owned. Between them stands a license for subsoil use, which is essentially a lease agreement, but the real mechanism of state control is absent or ineffective [1].

PART 2. HOW THE USSR WAS DESTROYED: LESSONS FROM HISTORY

Alexey Kapustin, a former instructor of the Leningrad Regional Committee of the CPSU who oversaw the food industry, described the technology:

“Once I visited the ‘Aist’ soap factory. The director showed me warehouses packed with soap that would have lasted for five years. But a week later, soap disappeared from stores. Cooperatives brought trucks, paid in cash — bought everything. And then, waiting for panic, they released the soap for sale at inflated prices.”

This is the classic scheme:

1. Create a shortage — buy up the goods.
2. Wait for panic — people start to fear.
3. Sell at inflated prices — get superprofits.
4. Blame the system — say that “socialism is inefficient.”

Result: the people were driven to despair to justify the liquidation of socialism and the accelerated construction of capitalism.

PART 3. THE 2026 FUEL CRISIS: EXACTLY THE SAME SCHEME

Compare:

USSR (late 1980s)

Russia (2026)

Shortage of soap, tobacco, gasoline

Shortage of gasoline, diesel [2][3]

Speculators bought up goods

Speculators and traders control the market [3]

Corrupt officials turned a blind eye

FAS fines, but the problem is not systematically solved

The West supported destabilization

External factors — sanctions, but problems are internal [2][4]

Socialism declared inefficient

State regulation declared inefficient

Transition to capitalism

Preservation of the oligarchic model

Khazin says: “sabotage.” And he is right.

PART 4. SYSTEMIC EXAMPLE: OIL REFINING IN GERMANY AND KAZAKHSTAN

A parallel process is occurring beyond Russia’s borders. The refinery in German Schwedt, which supplies Berlin with fuel, is in a state of limbo due to ownership confusion. The German government took the refinery under trusteeship after 2022 but refused to fully nationalize it. The plant cannot switch to processing other types of crude oil that differ significantly in composition from Russian Urals.

In Kazakhstan, the Atyrau Refinery, built in 1945 under the Lend-Lease program, is in a zone of uncertainty. The plant does not publish its financial results and regularly appears in accident chronicles.

Everywhere the same problem: old plants built by the state are managed by private management that does not invest, but only exploits [1].

PART 5. WHO CAUSED THE FUEL COLLAPSE?

Version 1. Vertically Integrated Oil Companies and Traders

Vertically integrated companies control production, refining, and sales. They can create artificial shortages by redirecting fuel for export or reducing refinery utilization.

Facts [2][3][4]:

Refinery utilization is reduced — in June, Russian refineries processed about 560,000 tons of oil per day, the lowest figure for this period in recent years [2].
Gasoline production at the end of June was approximately 90,000 tons per day, which is 25% less than a year earlier, with summer daily consumption exceeding 110,000 tons [2].
The Russian government introduced a complete ban on diesel fuel exports [3][4].
Russia began importing petroleum products — an oil-exporting country is importing gasoline [3][4].

Question: who benefits from the shortage? Those who control the market.

Version 2. Speculators and the “Fifth Gas Station”

As in the USSR with soap, fuel is now being bought up by resellers. They create a frenzy and then sell at inflated prices.

Facts [3][4][5]:

In Irkutsk, police stopped the activities of underground gasoline sellers who were trading fuel at 250 rubles per liter right next to an official gas station [5].
In Irkutsk, residents wait in lines for gasoline for 18 hours [3].
Across Russia, gasoline is being siphoned from parked cars — thieves drill holes in fuel tanks, cut hoses, break caps [4].

Question: who is behind the resellers? Who gives them money and coordinates?

Version 3. Sabotage Aimed at Obtaining Benefits

We have already analyzed in the article “Oil Refineries: Who Owns the Legacy” [2] how the head of the RSPP, Alexander Shokhin, proposed tax benefits for restoring refineries after drone attacks.

The chain:

1. Attack on a refinery (Omsk, 2,500 km from the border) [3].
2. Damage, shutdown of capacities.
3. RSPP requests tax deductions.
4. The state grants benefits.

Question: isn’t the creation of the crisis part of a strategy to obtain preferences?

PART 6. SYSTEMIC PICTURE: HOW IT WORKS

Stage

USSR (1980s)

Russia (2026)

Creation of shortage

Speculators bought up goods

VICs and traders restrict supplies [2][3]

Panic

People feared being left without soap

People fear being left without gasoline, 18-hour lines [3]

Superprofit

Goods were sold at exorbitant prices

Fuel prices rise, underground sellers at 250 rubles/liter [5]

Blame the system

“Socialism is inefficient”

Putin calls the crisis “temporary” and links it to Ukraine [6]

Beneficiaries

Speculators, shadow economy, the West

VICs, traders, oligarchs

Result

Collapse of the USSR

Industry degradation, price increases, fuel imports [3][4]

PART 7. GLOBAL CONTEXT: RESOURCE EXPROPRIATION

What we see in Russia is not a unique phenomenon. This is a global model that works wherever there are resources.

Western “investments” in third world countries are often not investments but plunder of subsoil and other resources under the beautiful word “development.” Large corporations come, take the most valuable things, and when the resource is exhausted or becomes unprofitable — they leave, leaving behind destroyed ecology and a degraded economy.

The mechanism is the same [1]:

1. Gain control over the resource (through privatization, concessions, debt schemes).
2. Exploit the resource with minimal investment.
3. Withdraw profits to offshore accounts.
4. When the resource is exhausted or becomes unprofitable — leave, leaving debts and devastation.

In Russia, this model works in oil refining. Plants built by the people became private “assets.” Management does not invest but withdraws profits. When a crisis occurs, they ask for new benefits [1].

PART 8. WHY THIS MATTERS NOW

Khazin speaks of “sabotage.” We speak of a systemic scheme that repeats itself.

The technology is the same [1][2][3]:

1. Create a problem — restrict fuel supplies to the domestic market.
2. Wait for panic — lines at gas stations, panic demand [3].
3. Make a profit — rising fuel prices [3][4].
4. Blame the state — “Ukraine is trying to ruin the vacation season” [6].
5. Receive new preferences — tax benefits for refineries [1].

In the case of fuel:

Created a shortage (gasoline production fell by 25%) [2].
Waited for panic (panic demand increased by 20–30%) [3].
Got price increases (fuel costs increased by 15.9% year-on-year) [7].
Blamed the state and Ukraine (“temporary crisis”) [6].
Now asking for tax benefits [1].

MAIN CONCLUSION

Khazin is right: the fuel crisis in Russia is not an external factor. It is internal sabotage with inaction from regulatory bodies [1][2].

This is exactly how the USSR was destroyed.

The same schemes. The same methods. The same beneficiaries.

Question: who will stop this scheme now?

CONNECTION TO OUR CYCLE “ARCHITECTURE OF NEW REALITY”

This article is a continuation of our material “The Agony of the Map: Why the Stock Market No Longer Saves” [1].

In “The Agony of the Map” we showed:

The map (financial instruments) detached from the territory (real resources).
Stocks and bonds are not value, but the opinion of the crowd.
The system is agonizing because old models have stopped working.

In this article we show the same logic using oil refining as an example:

Legal fictions (joint-stock companies, privatization) became detached from real plants.
Management manages the map, not the territory.
The crisis is not an accident but a natural result of a systemic scheme.

Architectural conclusion [1]: Wherever the map detaches from the territory, a crisis arises. And this crisis is always beneficial to those who control the map — because they can create shortages, make a profit, and ask for new benefits.

LIST OF MATERIALS IN THE “ARCHITECTURE OF NEW REALITY” CYCLE

[1] “The Agony of the Map: Why the Stock Market No Longer Saves” — an analysis of how financial instruments became detached from the real economy, and why the old system is agonizing // “Kafedra” and SforNews, 2026.

[2] “Oil Refineries: Who Owns the Legacy and Why It Doesn’t Work” — how plants built by the people became private “assets,” and the crisis exposed their true value // “Kafedra” and SforNews, July 8, 2026.

[3] “Chronicle of Cynicism: 30 Years of the Same Scheme” — analysis of Shokhin’s proposal for tax benefits for refineries // “Kafedra” and SforNews, 2026.

ADDITIONAL SOURCES ON THE FUEL CRISIS

[2] liga.net — “Russia is trying to overcome the fuel shortage: why every solution creates a new problem” (expert analysis of production and shortages), July 5, 2026.

[3] nv.ua — “Russia has completely stopped diesel exports and will import petroleum products for the first time,” July 8, 2026.

[4] charter97.link — “”Fuel pirates” have appeared in Russia” (about fuel thefts), July 8, 2026.

[5] osnmedia.ru — “Bunina stated that the fuel crisis could last until autumn,” July 8, 2026.

[6] unn.ua — “Putin called the fuel crisis in Russia “temporary,”” July 8, 2026.

[7] dialog.ua — “Ukraine’s strikes have made Russians much poorer,” July 7, 2026.

WHAT CAN BE DONE?

1. Do not give new benefits without guarantees. Investments must be verified. Control must be real. Responsibility must be personal.
2. Conduct a market audit. Who controls fuel supplies? Who creates the shortage? Who buys up fuel for resale?
3. Strengthen export control. If fuel goes abroad while there is a domestic shortage — this is not a market, this is sabotage [3].
4. Hold the beneficiaries accountable. Those who have been withdrawing profits for 30 years must pay for restoration [1][2].

The material was prepared by the editorial board of “Kafedra” and SforNews magazines. When citing, a link to the original source is mandatory.

Follow new investigations on Sfornews (https://sfornews.com/)

The analysis is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice.

  • Latest articles

  • More from the archive Analytics Architecture of the New Reality Fuel Crisis Oil & Gas Industry Russian Economy Systemic Analysis