MEMORANDUM. PART 3: Geoeconomic Context — Europe as Eternal Bitcoin Importer, China as Architect of a Parallel System, the US Losing Control, BRICS+ as a Battlefield of Architectures, and Russia Between Old Pipes and the New Digital | SforNews

  • 11 Sep, 2026
    | Salome K

MEMORANDUM. PART 3. GEOECONOMIC CONTEXT: RUSSIA AS AN ENERGY SOVEREIGN

3.1. Europe — the Perpetual Importer of Bitcoin

Diagnosis: Europe closed nuclear power for political reasons. Killed oil refining. Abandoned cheap gas. Renewables do not provide baseload power.

Map: “Energy independence, green transition, cheap energy.”

Territory: Closed factories, dying industry, dependence on imports, gas at historic highs.

Architectural conclusion: Europe cannot return to cheap energy — it is a political taboo. The only way to gain access to “energy” without physical supplies is to buy Bitcoin. It will import it as a “clean asset,” but in reality — energy that it cannot produce itself.

Key fact: Europe pays $700–716 per thousand cubic meters of gas, with storage facilities 53.67% full (15.59 percentage points below average).

3.2. China — the Architect of a Parallel System

Diagnosis: China is not waiting for the old system to collapse. It is building a parallel one. e-CNY. mBridge. Gold for 20 consecutive months. Mining is officially banned, unofficially — one-third of the world’s hashrate.

Map: “The yuan as a global currency, exports, technological leadership.”

Territory: Debt, demographics, conflict with the United States, dependence on energy imports.

Architectural conclusion: China is the architect of its own system. mBridge is not a “SWIFT replacement,” but parallel infrastructure ($69 billion, 95% — in e-CNY). Russia for China is not a partner, but a supplier at a discount. The demand for $50 per thousand cubic meters under “Power of Siberia 2” is not bargaining. It is a diagnosis.

Key fact: China demands a price 5 times lower than the current one and 8 times lower than what other Gazprom clients pay.

3.3. The United States — Losing Control Over Global Liquidity

Diagnosis: The United States is the world’s largest economy, but its financial model is cracking at the seams. National debt — $39.38 trillion. The Fed keeps the rate at 3.5–3.75%, inflation has been above 2% for more than five years. Trust in the dollar is falling.

Map: “The dollar — global currency, Treasuries — risk-free asset, financial dominance.”

Territory: Debt of $40 trillion, declining trust, inflation, fragmentation of the world into currency blocs.

Architectural conclusion: The United States is the defender of the old system, attempting to use new instruments to preserve it. It bans CBDCs until 2030, but accumulates Bitcoin. It leads in mining (37.5–42.5%), but depends on Chinese equipment (97%). It promotes ESG, but ignores it at home.

Key fact: Net interest expenses will reach 13.95% of all federal spending in fiscal year 2026.

3.4. BRICS+ and Gold: An Alternative Circuit

Diagnosis: BRICS+ is not an “anti-Western club.” It is a laboratory in which different models of the future are being tested. China is building its own system. India is promoting CBDC integration. Russia is trying to monetize energy through mining — without a strategy. The UAE and Saudi Arabia bring control over energy capital.

Map: “Multipolarity, de-dollarization, technological sovereignty.”

Territory: Asymmetry within the bloc, lack of a unified strategy, legal vacuum.

Architectural conclusion: BRICS+ possesses enormous energy potential, but cannot coordinate it. Gold is the only asset that unites everyone (more than 6,000 tons, 17.4% of global reserves). But gold is the past. The future belongs to those who can convert energy into digital liquidity.

Key fact: The NDB approved more than 130 projects worth $42 billion over 10 years, but technological exchange does not occur — each country implements its own programs.

3.5. Russia Between Two Worlds: Old Pipelines and New Digital

Diagnosis: Russia is the only country that simultaneously:

  • Has the cheapest energy in the world ($0.02–0.04/kWh).
  • Ranks 2nd in the world in Bitcoin hashrate (13–17%).
  • Has a huge energy surplus (Siberia, the Far East, hydroelectric power plants, nuclear power plants).
  • Does not have a systemic strategy for using this resource.
  • Is under sanctions that have cut off physical channels for energy exports.

Map: “Energy superpower, oil and gas exports, stable ruble.”

Territory: Pipelines are closed, tankers are under sanctions, refineries are underloaded, domestic fuel crisis, the Central Bank cannot contain inflation (9–12% against a forecast of 4–6%).

Architectural conclusion: Russia is not a “Bitcoin importer,” like Europe. It has its own energy, its own miners, its own reserves. But it does not use this resource systematically. For Russia, Bitcoin is the only available channel for monetizing energy under sanctions. This is not an “investment strategy.” This is a survival tool.

Key fact: The cost of mining 1 BTC in Russia is $35,000–45,000 — the lowest in the world.

3.6. Architectural Conclusion for Part 3

The world is not choosing between the old and new systems. It is redrawing the map along geopolitical lines.

Europe pays dearly for politics.

China demands subsidies through strength.

The United States is losing control over global liquidity.

BRICS+ is seeking an alternative circuit, but cannot agree.

Russia is losing ground due to the absence of alternatives.

Main conclusion: The old system is dead. It did not collapse — it simply stopped working. The new system can only be built around energy. And the only instrument that converts energy into global liquidity is Bitcoin.

The question is not whether the transition will happen. The question is who will be its architect.

APPENDICES TO THE MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX 1. EUROPE

Countries: Germany, United Kingdom, Switzerland, EU as a whole.

Key facts:

Country Role Key fact
Germany Victim of policy Closed nuclear power, imports 95% of gas, stagflation, 0.5% growth
United Kingdom Observer Brexit, stagflation, debt at 94.3% of GDP, digital pound postponed
Switzerland Quiet laboratory wCBDC, Crypto Valley, 47% of European blockchain financing
EU Perpetual importer Gas $700–716, storage 53.67%, industry is dying

Architectural conclusion: Europe will become a perpetual importer of Bitcoin. It will buy it as a “clean asset,” but in reality — energy that it cannot physically produce.

APPENDIX 2. ASIA

Countries: China, India, Japan, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan, Oman, Turkey, Georgia.

Key facts:

Country Role Key fact
China Architect e-CNY, mBridge $69 billion, gold for 20 consecutive months
India Digital giant in a trap UPI 10 billion transactions, e-Rupee, energy deficit, gray zone for crypto
Japan Observer Debt at 250% of GDP, YCC, exit from deflation postponed
UAE Architect ADGM, VARA, mBridge, mining on cheap gas, PIF $1 trillion
Saudi Arabia Institutional builder PIF $1 trillion, tokenization, mBridge, CRS 2.0
Kazakhstan Pragmatic builder Digital tenge, 10% of mining in reserve, mBridge, 460,000 devices
Oman Bridge and experiment State pool Omanhash 10 EH/s, Trump threats
Turkey Battlefield 30% hyperinflation, ban on crypto ATMs, stablecoin limits
Georgia Bridge between worlds Gold, transit, digital lari, GELT, EU sanctions on 3 platforms

Architectural conclusion: Asia is a battlefield of three strategies: state CBDC infrastructure (China), regulated private markets (Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan), direct accumulation and mining (UAE, Saudi Arabia, Kazakhstan, Oman).

APPENDIX 3. THE AMERICAS

Countries: United States, Brazil, Paraguay, Venezuela, El Salvador.

Key facts:

Country Role Key fact
United States Defender of the old system Debt $39 trillion, mining leader at 37.5–42.5%, CBDC ban until 2030
Brazil Green giant DREX, sugarcane mining, stablecoins 80%
Paraguay Laboratory of success 4th place by hashrate, 3,480 MW surplus, tariff $0.037–0.050
Venezuela Anti-example Mining ban with 10.2 GW potential, destruction of 4,000 ASICs
El Salvador First Bitcoin reserve, but the IMF confirmed: purchases are from private donations

Architectural conclusion: The Americas are a micro-model of the global transition. Everything is here: success (Paraguay, Brazil), failure (Venezuela), potential (United States), first experience (El Salvador).

APPENDIX 4. AFRICA

Countries: Ethiopia, Nigeria, South Africa, Kenya, Zambia.

Key facts:

Country Role Key fact
Ethiopia Breakthrough Top-10 by hashrate (2.5%), 600 MW for mining, crypto ban for citizens
Nigeria Second front 25.9 million users, flared gas, SEC regulates
South Africa Regulatory leader Crypto assets = financial products, FATF Travel Rule
Kenya Growing market VASP Bill, mining discussions with Marathon Digital
Zambia Mini-grids A mining container with 120 ASICs turned an unprofitable hydroelectric plant into a sustainable one

Architectural conclusion: Africa is a micro-model of the global transition. 90% of hydropower is unused. Mining as a “buyer of last resort” turns unprofitable renewable energy projects into sustainable ones.

APPENDIX 5. THE MIDDLE EAST

Countries: UAE, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Iran.

Key facts:

Country Role Key fact
UAE Architect ADGM, VARA, mBridge, mining on cheap gas
Saudi Arabia Institutional builder PIF $1 trillion, tokenization, mBridge, CRS 2.0
Oman Bridge State pool Omanhash 10 EH/s, Trump threats
Iran Bitcoin as a weapon Sanctions, $1.3 billion in mining, IRGC controls 50%

Architectural conclusion: The Middle East is the region where oil meets the digital world. The UAE and Saudi Arabia are consciously building the new system. Iran is building it for survival. Oman is balancing between the United States and Iran.

APPENDIX 6. LATIN AMERICA

Countries: Paraguay, Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina, Colombia.

Key facts:

Country Role Key fact
Paraguay Laboratory of success 4.3% of global hashrate, 3,480 MW surplus
Brazil Green giant DREX, mining on bagasse, stablecoins 80%
Venezuela Anti-example Mining ban, destruction of 4,000 ASICs, 2,500 MW deficit
Argentina Loss Hashrate fell by 42%, Bitfarms left, Vaca Muerta is waiting
Colombia Attempt Tariff $0.203/kWh — 4 times above profitability

Architectural conclusion: Latin America is a micro-model of the global transition. Everything is here: success (Paraguay), failure (Venezuela), potential (Argentina), attempt (Colombia).

APPENDIX 7. RUSSIA AND THE POST-SOVIET SPACE

Countries: Russia, Kazakhstan, Georgia.

Key facts:

Country Role Key fact
Russia Energy sovereign without a strategy 2nd place by hashrate, $35,000–45,000 cost, no strategy
Kazakhstan Pragmatic builder Digital tenge, 10% of mining in reserve, mBridge
Georgia Bridge between worlds Gold, transit, digital lari, GELT

Architectural conclusion: The post-Soviet space is a laboratory where different models of transition are being tested. Russia has the resource, but does not have a strategy. Kazakhstan has a strategy and is building. Georgia is seeking its own path between East and West.

APPENDIX 8. COUNTRIES THAT BAN

Countries: Venezuela, Turkey, China (partially).

Key facts:

Country Ban Reason
Venezuela Complete mining ban since May 2026 “Impact on the power grid,” destruction of 4,000 ASICs
Turkey Ban on crypto ATMs, stablecoin limits “Risks,” use of stablecoins to finance terrorism
China Official mining ban “Environmental risks,” but unofficially — 3rd place by hashrate

Architectural conclusion: Bans do not work. Citizens continue to use cryptocurrencies to protect savings from inflation and devaluation. Bans only push them into the shadows.

APPENDIX 9. COUNTRIES THAT OBSERVE

Countries: India, Japan, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Germany.

Key facts:

Country Position Key fact
India Observer UPI, e-Rupee, gray zone for crypto, top-5 by trading volume
Japan Observer Debt at 250% of GDP, YCC, exit from deflation postponed
United Kingdom Observer Brexit, stagflation, digital pound postponed
Switzerland Quiet laboratory wCBDC, Crypto Valley, 47% of European blockchain financing
Germany Victim of policy Closed nuclear power, imports 95% of gas, stagflation

Architectural conclusion: Observers are those who have not yet decided. But their choice will determine the future. If they join the new system — it will become global. If they remain in the old one — it will exist in parallel.

APPENDIX 10. COUNTRIES THAT ARE BUILDING

Countries: UAE, Kazakhstan, El Salvador, Paraguay, Georgia, Saudi Arabia.

Key facts:

Country Building Key fact
UAE Crypto hub ADGM, VARA, mBridge, mining on cheap gas
Kazakhstan National crypto reserve Digital tenge, 10% of mining in reserve, mBridge
El Salvador Bitcoin reserve First in the world, but the IMF confirmed: purchases are from private donations
Paraguay Mining hub 4.3% of global hashrate, tariff $0.037–0.050
Georgia Bridge Digital lari, GELT, gold, transit
Saudi Arabia Tokenization PIF $1 trillion, mBridge, CRS 2.0

Architectural conclusion: Builders are those who are already creating the new system. They are not waiting for the old one to collapse. They are building in parallel. And their experience is the evidentiary basis of the Memorandum.